| PRINT
THIS PAGE
WOMEN'S SPORT HISTORY
The Women's Olympic Games:
Important Breakthrough Obscured By Time
by Bruce Kidd
Published in CAAWS Action Bulletin, Spring 1994
The Women's Olympic Games have long been forgotten,
but during the 1920s and 1930s they were an important, international
focal point for feminist efforts to improve women's sporting
opportunities.
The Women's Olympics were the brainchild of the remarkable
Alice Milliat of France. A translator by profession, a rower
and sports administrator by avocation, she was founder and
president of La Fédération Sportive Féminine
Internationale (FSFI). She started the Women's Games in direct
response to the repeated refusal of the International Olympic
Committee (IOC) and the International Amateur Athletic Federation
(IAAF) to put women's track and field on the program of the
Olympic Games which they organized.
Although women had competed at the IOC's Games since 1900
— initially in tennis and golf, and later in archery,
gymnastics, skating, and swimming — these events were
initiated by Games organizers and sympathetic international
federations like La Fédération International
de Natation Amateur. If IOC founder and president Pierre de
Coubertin and some of his colleagues had had their way, these
competitions would never have been held. The combined opposition
of the IOC and the IAAF kept women out of the most prestigious
sport on the program — track and field. But in their
buoyant, post-suffrage enthusiasm for new frontiers, women
in many countries were competing in track and field in record
numbers and achieving record times. If they couldn't enter
de Coubertin's Games, Milliat decided, then they would have
an Olympics of their own.
The first "women's Olympic Games" was a one-day
track meet in Paris in 1922. Eighteen athletes broke world
records before 20,000 spectators. The second Games were held
in Gothenberg, Sweden, four years later. Women from 10 nations,
including distant Japan, took part. (Canada was not one of
them). With a spectacular opening ceremony and marchpast,
the patronage of the Swedish royal family, and several world
records, the Games evoked comparisons with the IOC's Stockholm
Olympics of 1912.
Such was the growing prestige of women's track and field
that the IAAF wanted control. They were forced to meet with
Milliat. In the ensuing negotiations, she agreed to change
the name of the FSFI's event from the Women's Olympics —
a name which infuriated the IOC and the IAAF — to the
Women's World Games in exchange for 10 events on the IOC's
program.
Although Milliat kept her part of the bargain, the IAAF subsequently
granted only five events. A majority of the FSFI went along,
ensuring women's competition at the 1928 Olympics in Amsterdam
where Ethel Catherwood, Bobbie Rosenfeld and the Canadian
women's relay team excelled, but the powerful British Women's
Athletics Association, whose athletes had dominated the Games
in Gothenberg, refused to accept anything less than the 10-event
minimum. They stayed away from Amsterdam, the only feminist
boycott in Olympic history.
When Canada competed in the Women's Games for the first time
in 1930 in Prague, several additional sports were on the program.
The sole Canadian entry was the University of British Columbia
basketball team, runners-up to the Edmonton Grads for national
honours that year, and winners of the Games' championship.
The four consecutive "Olympic" championships, held
at the time of the IOC's Games and claimed by the Grads, were
all organized by the FSFI as well.
What proved to be the final FSFI Games were held in London
in 1934, immediately following the British Empire Games. A
number of Canadian women were thus able to participate in
the more extensive FSFI program which included 12 events in
track and field, compared to six at the British Empire Games.
One of those events was the 800m, which the IAAF banned after
several of the Amsterdam competitors showed more signs of
physical exertion than patriarchal sensitivities could stomach.
It would be another 32 years before women would again compete
in an Olympic 800m race.
In 1935, Milliat tried to up the ante, proposing that the
IOC provide a full women's program and equal women's representation
on the IOC. If not, she said, the FSFI should be allowed to
run a completely separate Olympic Games for women. But the
IAAF effectively countered by taking over women's track and
field, the FSFI's strongest suit. In the view of Milliat's
biographers, Mary Leigh and Thérèse Bonim, "the
FSFI had no recourse; all its cards had been played."
1 The world-wide depression and the rise to power of fascism
in Europe had seriously weakened the women's sports movement.
It would take the rise of second wave feminism a generation
later before the FSFI's victories were extended.
Alice Milliat deserves to be remembered with honour. She
was the first to significantly push the IOC towards gender
equity, and her achievements prepared the ground for subsequent
advances.
1 "The pioneering role of Madame Alice Milliat and the
FSFI in establishing international track and field for women",
Journal of Sport History, 4 (1), 1977, p. 82.
Bruce Kidd’s writing reveals his astonishing range of
interests and knowledge of sport. Among his published works
are articles dealing with physical activity, athletes' rights,
the place of sport in the modern state, physical education for
adults, sport and masculinity, and the philosophy of excellence.
Almost single-handedly, he has brought attention to illustrious
but largely forgotten contributors to Canada's rich sporting
history such as the ground-breaking Women's Amateur Athletic
Federation. His most recent work, The Struggle for Canadian
Sport, won the North American Society for Sport History Book
Award in 1997. During the 1960's, Bruce was Canada's best known
middle-distance runner, winning the Lou Marsh Trophy for his
successes on the track. He was twice chosen Canada's Male Athlete
of the Year.
|