Appointment
of swim coach makes waves
First female chosen to Olympic swim staff plunges organization into controversy
as many feel selection criteria flawed
JAMES CHRISTIE
The Globe and Mail
Sports Reporter; With files from Nikki Dryden, two-time Olympic swimmer and 15-time
national champion.
Toronto -- The appointment of Canada's first female Olympic
swim coach began as an affirmative-action move, a positive exercise in political
correctness.
But within a week it has sunk the tradition-bound
sport deep into a pool of controversy and name-calling over
whether head coach Dave Johnson of Calgary overlooked highly
qualified senior coaches and flouted selection criteria to appoint
26-year-old Toronto Torch coach Shauna Nolden.
Johnson, who has been coaching Olympic swimmers since 1976,
and Swimming Canada chief executive officer Harold Cliff readily say that Nolden's
appointment did not follow the criteria used to select the male coaches.
Rather, they said, the chief factor in choosing Nolden as
the first woman on the Olympic staff was to get "the right person," not
necessarily the most accomplished. Comparing coaching records was deemed
"irrelevant" in this case, Cliff said.
The federal government funding agency Sport Canada is
pushing national sport bodies to have females make up 30 per cent of coaching ranks by
2004, Johnson said, and swimming needed a trailblazer personality.
That has spurred outrage in different sectors of the swim
community. Some members of the coaching fraternity -- long regarded as an old-boys' club
-- have called Nolden undeserving. None of the swimmers who train with her qualified for
finals at the Olympic team trials in Montreal last week.
Moreover, Swimming Canada must apply to the Canadian
Olympic Association to get Nolden an exemption from the COA's requirement of a Level 4
coaching certificate. She is about to complete Level 3, she says, and is enrolled in Level
4 courses.
Other female coaches are angered that the appointment was
arbitrary and there was no opportunity to apply for the position. And there is a torrent
of gossip though the chat rooms of Internet Web sites frequented by national-level
swimmers -- juvenile insults, vicious personal attacks and a call for Johnson to quit.
"I'm sorry it [the mudslinging] is out there. It casts
a shadow on a really great thing," Nolden said. "Dave Johnson is extremely
professional, as am I. You don't make an appointment to an Olympic team and risk the
performance of the team."
Many coaches say they understand the initiative to advance
women in their ranks. Most of Canada's graduating female swimmers don't give a thought to
coaching because they've never seen a female coach rise above the grassroots level in a
male-dominated hierarchy.
None of the experience and expertise women swimmers receive
from the system gets churned back in because they see no hope of getting to the top.
Nolden's advancement would send a different message, Johnson said.
"It's not my preferred modus operandi in terms of
transparency," Johnson admits. "We don't have a lot to defend on that side of
things. I considered a number of different people and felt this was best candidate at this
time.
"Generally speaking, there's been a lot of lip service
to promoting women in swimming but nothing was ever done. We had to send a message we were
clearly serious about it. It's a bloody hard decision, but I think it's the right
decision.
"This top-down approach has more potential than to
develop a system and wait for one [a female Olympic coach] to emerge. We've been waiting
25 years and no one's emerged with the system we have. I felt jump-starting the system is
a more appropriate way to go than waiting and constructing the model. I'd rather have a
coach with Olympic credentials in the mix for the next four years and put others into the
scene, rather than arrive in 2004 with a number of untried candidates."
But critics say it's unfair to other women who have coached
longer and had international experience to put Nolden on the squad without some kind of
selection process. There will be a teleconference emergency meeting of the Canadian Swim
Coaches Association on Monday to discuss the issue and what course of action is available.
The association represents about 900 swim coaches, both male and female. Its 12-member
board of directors includes two women.
Nolden coached at the world short-course championships in
Greece and on the World Cup circuit last year.
"I can honestly say that I have not seen an act of
such political incorrectness and questionable integrity as that which Mr. Dave Johnson has
made," said Andrew Moss, assistant coach at the National Training Centre in Calgary.
"It is an absolute insult that Johnson's personal
approval of a coach's potential should override a process which was laid out in great
detail prior to the Olympic swim trials and which all coaches at the competition
understood to be in effect."
Johnson said the job given Nolden was created when more
swimmers than anticipated qualified for the team.
Among other possible candidates were Lucie Hewitt of
Oakville, who had two swimmers in the finals at the Olympic trials and Linda Kiefer of
Toronto who was head coach of Canada's World University Games team.
"If there was no set criteria, the appointment lacks
credibility, which sets women coaches back instead of elevating them," Hewitt said.
Kiefer concurred: "We are trying to find out the
criteria that was used. If there was none, then I think this is a step back for women in
coaching."
Johnson said the feds didn't put a gun to the head of
Swimming Canada to force the issue of a female coach for this Olympics. But Cliff,
Swimming Canada's CEO, said there was definitely a politically correct angle to the move.
"That's not necessarily the wrong thing to do. We
believe it's the right thing to do. If we had to defend it on process alone, we couldn't:
It wasn't in the selection criteria, and it wasn't advertised in advance. We consulted
with swimmers and the swimmers' representative [to Swimming Canada] and the coaches' rep
and everyone was okay with it -- albeit with nervousness about the lack of process.
"We felt it's the right opportunity and I trust Dave,
and if he tells me it's going to be of benefit, he has my support. We didn't displace a
coach. We completed a selection process and named her as an additional coach. We didn't
take a spot from one of the eligible coaches.
"She's not there as a pure token. We weren't
interested in that."
Nolden said a female coach provides a different frame of
reference for women swimmers. "I can understand what they're going through when
they're tired, when their stroke isn't right, and when they're frustrated. I can
understand as a female and as a coach.
"Our female swimmers have so much to offer with their
technical ability and experience. If women aren't coming to coach because they don't feel
they can have a leadership role, we'll never achieve our potential.
"I wrote a paper in university -- are second stringers
leading the country in U.S. politics? I suggested maybe the best people don't want to be
in politics because they don't want to deal with the scrutiny. Comparatively, you can say
the same women in coaching. There's a lot to put up with.
"But our swimmers are smart, beautiful, confident,
ambitious girls. They're used to trying to make it to the top. They want a career that
feeds into that. They perceived they couldn't break into the old-boys' [coaching] network
and I think that's where Harold Cliff and Dave Johnson were coming from. It's not
tokenism. I'm going to coach. I have a skill set."
The controversy will continue. Victor Lachance, chief
executive officer of the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport, says the situation cries out
for a sport mediation or arbitration process "and it's a priority with the Minister
of State for Amateur Sport, but we don't have a new one in place yet.
"There have been historical wrongs [limited roles of
women in sport] but you can't lose another principle in addressing them. You can't trade
one noble principle -- objective selection of staff -- for another, advancing women in
sport."
Reprinted with permission
Back to Swimming
Index